What is now a segment of W. Hilary St. in Pensacola, once was known as Chipley Alley. It lies just south of W. Garden St. between S. Coyle St. and S. Reus St. It was near the site of the old Frisco railroad freight and passenger terminal building. On the night of July 4, and early morning of July 5, 1926, 410 Chipley Alley was the site of a vicious attack on two adults, and two children by an axe-wielding madman.
Preston
Pickern, a 34-year-old carpenter, and his wife Hattie had spent part of the evening
of July 4th in Cantonment at an Independence Day celebration, where
Hattie won a cake. Two children, 6-year-old
Emmett Simpson, son of Hattie from her previous marriage, and 13-year-old
Lucille Cushings, Hattie’s little sister had remained home.
From Pensacola News Journal
Dec. 31, 1949
A
neighbor, Mrs. Ella Martin was awakened just before dawn, by a low rumbling
sound she could not identify, and got up to investigate. She walked outside and looked through the Pickern’s window.
Seeing the gruesome scene, she ran inside screaming, “Hattie, Hattie!”
She later said that Mrs. Pickern had mumbled something and lapsed into
unconsciousness. In the adjoining room
lay the two battered children, still clinging to life.
Mrs.
Martin called the police and requested they bring an ambulance. The first officer on the scene was Captain J.
R. Simmons, followed soon by Chief of Police William O’Connell. The officers found the room in disarray, and
the walls covered in blood. There was
evidence of a struggle in the adult’s room.
An axe
covered with hair and blood was found in the children’s bed. The axe was
delivered to fingerprint expert Robert Forrest, and after extensive examination,
he could find no usable prints. A shoe was also found in the house that showed
a defect in the sole that matched shoeprints found outside in the unpaved
alley.
As the
rumors spread through the local community, a crowd began to gather to view the
scene of the crime. All four victims were transferred to the hospital. Mr. Pickern was near death and was only
given a few hours to live. His wife Hattie was unconscious with severe gashes
to her head. At this time, the children
were reported near death, but a few hours later they regained
consciousness. They both could not
remember what happened. They had been attacked while asleep and had no memory
of the assault.
The police
canvassed the neighborhood, questioning neighbors, friends, and acquaintances. They discovered that bad blood existed
between Pickern and a man named Taylor. As recent as June 28th,
members of Pickern’s family had appeared as witnesses against Taylor. Taylor and other members of his family were
brought in for questioning. (I haven’t been able to find out what the problem was between the
families.)
The authorities, being
concerned about a growing lynch mob atmosphere, beefed up security at the jail
in case they were attacked by vigilantes.
Preston J. Pickern died from his injuries at one pm on July 5th.
His wife, Hattie was still in a coma.
Hours
after Pickern died, Justice of the Peace, Judge Dan S. Nee summoned an
inquest. On Wednesday, July 7, a six-man
jury met a Nee’s office. Neither the
police nor the Jury could figure out a motive for the attack. Robbery was
discounted because the Pickern’s were not wealthy, and nothing was known to be
missing from the house.
Eleven
suspects were picked up and held for the investigation, but ultimately none
were charged with the crime. Chief O’Connell
told the press, “This case is being thoroughly investigated and we expect
sensational developments any minute.”
Police
talked to a man named J. H. Perkins, a train dispatcher for the St. Louis and
San Francisco railroad. He told officers he had seen a man from the railroad
yard the night of the murder. “I first saw him coming from the direction of the
Pickern house. He entered several yards and searched through some wood piles. I
saw him in one yard swinging an axe in his hands, then I saw him go toward the
Pickerin home.” He described the man as
being burly with black hair.
The
Coroner’s Jury heard all this testimony, including from the eleven
witnesses/suspects being held, but all the evidence was considered weak, and
circumstantial. With no new information coming to light, the hearing was
postponed.
On
Thursday, the eighth of July, the Governor of Florida, John Martin arrived in
Pensacola for the grand opening of the newly constructed Escambia Bay Bridge.
An estimated 10,000 cars crossed the bridge in the first 12 hours it was open.
The next
day, Hattie Pickern came out of her coma. She remembered seeing a man. She did
not know who he was. She remembered waking up when her husband was attacked,
and she believed she struggled with the assailant, but with no identification,
the investigators were at a loss.
Chipley
Alley was now known locally as, “Axe Murder Alley”. All but 3 of the eleven suspects were
released.
During the
investigation of the crime scene, police did find three, five-gallon kegs of homemade
liquor. The Federal authorities joined
the investigation to find out the origin of the illegal booze. After a brief probe, they determined that the
illegal whiskey had nothing to do with the attack.
On July
28, Judge Nee resumed the inquest, calling 23 witnesses, including Captain
Simmons, and Hattie Pickern. Mrs.
Pickern took the stand and related all she could remember from the night of
the attack. After she concluded without
revealing any new information, a man stood and approached the witness
stand. When asked if she recognized him,
Hattie said no, she had never seen him before.
The man, (whose
name was never revealed in court, and referred to as, “Mr. X” in the papers.),
asked her, “Is it not true that you accompanied me on a party at Bayview and
had a pistol which you used to shoot a spider on a tree?” Confused, Mrs. Pickern said, “No! I never
did such a trick and besides I don’t know you.
I have never seen you before!”
After Hattie stepped down, the stranger swore under oath that she had
accompanied him to Bayview and fired a pistol at a spider.
(This whole testimony is bizarre, to say the
least. Not only is any such occurrence irrelevant
to the case, but what exactly was she being accused of? Why was this witness
not identified? I don’t believe this
would ever be allowed in a courtroom today.)
After the testimony, the jury verdict predictably was that the crime was, “committed by
party, or parties’ unknown.”
In 1950 a
man named Robert Raymond Lassiter, in Greenville, South Carolina, confessed to
the murder of Mr. Pickern. He was arrested and brought to Pensacola but was
determined to be insane and sent to the state hospital in Chattahoochee until
he could be found sane enough to assist in his own defense.
In February
1959, it was determined that his mental condition had deteriorated, and there
was going to be no prosecution. The only
evidence against him was his own confession, and he claimed no motive other
than being drunk and only remembered attacking one person. He was released
into the custody of his family, who were going to put him in a private
institution.
This crime
is still unsolved, but some new information has been shared with me that sheds light on this case. I will update the story very soon.
Preston Pickren's body was transported to the Godwin Cemetery in Bratt, located in the northern part of the county. (See picture below.)
Preston Pickren's body was transported to the Godwin Cemetery in Bratt, located in the northern part of the county. (See picture below.)
Hattie got
married to Aulice McKenzie in February 1928, but divorced in 1930. She lived
until 1950, passing away in Pensacola.
Lucille
Cushing married Lloyd Williams and passed away in 2006. She was buried at
Pensacola Memorial Park.
In a December 1949 interview with the Pensacola Journal, Hattie said that Emmett had died in WWII while serving in the U.S. Navy.
It
seems that it wasn’t very hard to get away with murder in the Florida Panhandle
in the early part of the 1900s. I think
that unless there were credible eyewitnesses, or someone was caught
red-handed, there was little chance of prosecution.
"This crime is still unsolved, but some new information has been shared with me that sheds light on this case. I will update the story very soon." Following up on this... have you shared this update?
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately no. The person who contacted me with "new" information turned out to be unreliable. He made outlandish claims that were unsubstantiated.
ReplyDelete